From a previous blog: “The trouble for democracy, at this time in history, comes from our own poor ability to reform.”
Here is a short list of pending reform issues:
We need systemic economic reform. Societies that define themselves by security and inclusion cannot live by deprivation and division. Globalization and automation, the targets of the politics of discontent, come with enormous benefits in the form of affluence and quality of work and life. But we have not found a way of combining this progress with inclusiveness. To underwrite democracy under advanced capitalism, we need a new social contract. The shallow individualism and small-government gospel of Reaganism and Thatcherism has shipwrecked. Before inclusiveness in public policy must come inclusiveness in mindsets. It is a matter of nothing less than the reinvention of democratic political culture.
In Europe, the mindset of reform needs to include the European Union. British and European leaders should swallow their pride and sit down to devise a reformed union that can embrace all of Europe. The European Union is already a structure with many different forms of adhesion, from Swiss and Norwegian types of quasi-membership, via various combinations of inside and outside of the Schengen and the euro, to the comprehensive arrangements of the full-membership countries. Flexibility has proved to work and is now needed in respect to Brexit and to pre-empt other possible exits. Brussels may have to sacrifice a battle to win the war, but better that than to lose the war.
In Britain, the time is over-ripe for constitutional reform. It is a misunderstanding that Britain does not have a written constitution just because constitutional provisions are not collected into a single document with “constitution” its heading. But the constitution is poorly protected and open to political manipulation. The Brexit referendum was called by Prime Minister Cameron ahead of the 2015 general election for opportunistic party-political reasons. If they can, politicians of the day will manipulate the constitution for their own advantage. That should not be possible. By coincidence, the week after the vote, the Chilcot report of the inquiry into Britain’s participation in the 2003 invasion of Iraq and its aftermath was published, with deep criticism of a dysfunctional system of decision-making which resulted in colossal mistakes both on the entry into war and post-war management. Britain does not have a safe system of political decision-making.
In America, what burst through the surface in 2016 was the pent-up pressure from a long, relentless, step-by-step erosion of political culture in which big business has fortified itself as the power behind the throne. The reason there is gridlock in Washington is that the holders of office, in Congress in particular, are not free to make policies for the public good. When big money is allowed to transgress massively into politics, those who control it gain power to decide who the successful candidates will be—those they wish to fund—and what they can decide once in office—that which is acceptable to those who hold the purse-strings. The representatives, or most of them, may not be personally corrupt, but the system in which they work is one of deep collusion between big politics and big money. It is a misunderstanding that politicians chase money; it is money chasing politicians.
Read the full article in the Cairo Review.
5 thoughts on “THE DESPERATE NEED FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORM”
Excellent, Stein. Please keep going. We NEED this debate, and the reforms that, hopefully, will come as a result.
Keep up the good work!
Like the “money chasing politicians” . Much truer than “politicians chasing money” .
The full article on Cairo Review is really great. A lot of things that have been spinning around in my mind have been clarified by your article, thanks to your clear and dispassionate explanation. I’ve shared it on facebook and with concerned friends and family.
As I asked on facebook, given that we need reform, how is this reform to happen? How can our government dislodge itself from the financial interests that they find themselves beholden to? If 8 years of Obama could not swerve us towards a lower income disparity, or start the reform that he himself was calling for, what hope do we have now that Trump is president, and Republicans dominate all branches of government?
As you say, Stein, Chilcott showed clearly the huge weaknesses and failings of our decision making. But, while deploring that, we’ve done nothing which would prevent them being repeated.
As you rightly say, we have many constitutional checks and balances, (as did Obama in the USA), but neither he nor we have been able to enact Reform.